Query of the viability of using the HTTP api for Radkit directly

Hi, Please could I ask for some best practices advice regarding Radkit administration.

We need to programatically add users in to the Radkit service, and initially did so using the Radkit Control Api via python scripts. This had some drawbacks due to needing Radkit Control to be updated to keep parity with the service, and adding a lot of libraries to the environment.

We have replicated the needed functionality by directly connecting to the Radkit service (from the same server) using the same http api that the web frontend uses. I didn’t see any documentation talking about doing it this way (using chrome debug tools to check the requests and replicating these), so please could we check if this is a supported way of administering Radkit? If so it does look to offer a much more lightweight way to administer the service, however we want to make sure that we are not developing something which may be shut down in the future. If this is an acceptable way to be doing it, are there any plans to add documentation for this method, or is it something for which you would prefer people to be using the control setup? I appreciate that this might be a unique requirement/ setup where the device administering this is the same box from which Radkit service is being run.

Kind regards

Rob