Poll: Sequencers & Arps on Hardware Synths – Page 3 – Hardware (Instruments and Effects) Forum
I don’t really care about sequencers because I prefer to make it all in DAW (PC or MPC), because this way even if I say goodbye to a synth, the sequence will still be in a project. I don’t like to have fragmented projects.
Besides that, if I have to use a piano roll to trigger sequences then I see no point in doing it “twice”: in a piano roll and in a sequencer.
The only exclusion to this is TD-3 because it’s a very strange and quirky sequencer. Like I said in another topic: I like to use it for 1 pattern per track but if it’s more then I’m doing it in DAW.
Besides that, if I have to use a piano roll to trigger sequences then I see no point in doing it “twice”: in a piano roll and in a sequencer.
The only exclusion to this is TD-3 because it’s a very strange and quirky sequencer. Like I said in another topic: I like to use it for 1 pattern per track but if it’s more then I’m doing it in DAW.
On the other hand, I like to have an arp, just to play with it while tweaking sounds, tweaking for fun etc. But it’s just it and nothing else. If arp can be saved with a preset, it’s fine. But if it’s an analogue synth then I don’t bother to use the synth’s arp as part of the sound. I’ll do it in DAW.
Beware! The software discussed in this topic has unacceptable aliasing at -386dBTP but it can be fixed by changing the sample rate to 12Bit
Read more here: Source link