Re: musicXML: 2 staves, piano
On 9/24/21, 2:37 PM, "Ivanov Dmitry" <usr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 21-09-24 20:33:05, Carl Sorensen wrote: >Why are your writing your own musicXML and then using xml2ly, instead of just writing in lilypond? I am writing software for harmonization and XML is a better language for computers to read then lilypond. OK. I'm not sure I agree, but that's a personal opinion. I believe you are having the problem because you are misusing musicXML. I think for the piano, you need to have two staves, one for the upper staff, and one for the lower staff. Instead, you only have one staff, and use /backup (which I know was recommended on this list, but I think is not the correct way to do it. Please see this link for an example of how piano music is stored in musicXML: https://www.w3.org/2021/06/musicxml40/tutorial/notation-basics/ When I'm done looking at this example, it's very hard for me to see that musicXML is easier to deal with than lilypond syntax... I hope this link will help you. Carl
Read more here: Source link